Jarno de Graaf

Jarno de Graaf

Associate | Attorney at law

Corporate Law

Jarno de Graaf is actively involved in De Clercq’s broad corporate law practice, advising and guiding enterprises with respect to mergers, acquisitions and restructuring. He also provides support to entrepreneurs in a variety of disputes, including between shareholders or with clients of the company concerned.

Jarno is an approachable, committed and sympathetic attorney whose genuine interest enables him to understand your situation. With his structured, result-oriented approach, Jarno works with you to achieve the best possible outcome.

Education

Jarno studied law at Leiden University and developed an interest in corporate law after taking a number of subjects in that field. Following his successful internship with the Corporate Law team, Jarno joined De Clercq after obtaining his Master’s degree in Corporate Law.

Jarno's daily practice

‘My daily work involves advising and guiding entrepreneurs with respect to mergers, acquisitions and restructuring, including by drafting and reviewing contracts. I can also provide advice on disputes either within your company or externally with other companies or third parties. As an attorney in the broad corporate law field, I take a dynamic approach to my work and am committed to seeking practical solutions.’

Stay up to date

The latest developments

Corporate Law

Bankruptcy After Turboliquidation

21 August 2025

Turboliquidation is popular among entrepreneurs seeking to terminate their company quickly and cost-effectively.
With a single resolution by the shareholder(s) and registration with the Chamber of Commerce, the legal entity can cease to exist—provided that no assets remain. However, this does not automatically eliminate outstanding debts. Creditors may still petition the court to declare the company bankrupt. Below, you’ll find what is required for such a bankruptcy declaration and why careful application of turboliquidation is essential.

Read more

Corporate Law

Did the evaluation committee act within its mandate?

25 July 2025

A bidder accuses an evaluation committee of having acted outside the pre-established evaluation framework by failing to recognize the “added value” of his proposal. An interesting detail: this concerned a contract not subject to public procurement obligations. As a result, Part 2 of the Public Procurement Act does not apply. What does apply instead?

Read more

Corporate Law

Outcome of the consultation on the revision of the procurement directives

27 June 2025

The European Commission has published a summary of the initial findings from the consultation on the European procurement directives. The consultation yielded a total of 733 responses. What do these responses reveal about the functioning of the current directives?

Read more