This website uses cookies

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services.

Our privacy statement:

Robert Sanders

Robert Sanders

Attorney at law

Robert Sanders is a disciplinary law expert in De Clercq’s corporate law practice. He specialises in assisting independent professionals who are subject to disciplinary regulations within their field, such as lawyers, notaries, accountants and medical practitioners.

Disciplinary Law

Robert Sanders is a disciplinary law expert in De Clercq’s corporate law practice. He specialises in assisting independent professionals who are subject to disciplinary regulations within their field, such as lawyers, notaries, accountants and medical practitioners. He enjoys analysing content in detail, using the knowledge and insights he has acquired to help his clients.

Education and career

Following his law studies at Leiden University and after completing his military service as a reserve officer in the Royal Air Force, Robert embarked upon his civilian career in 1995 as an editor and publisher. He worked at three leading publishing houses over the course of 14 years, focusing on publishing medical, tax, financial and legal journals, among other things. In the meantime, he also completed his Bachelor’s degree in History (cum laude) at Utrecht University. In 2009, Robert switched to the Dutch Bar Association, where he mainly worked on disciplinary cases for more than six years, initially as a senior policy advisor and subsequently as an attorney. In 2017, Robert received his doctorate in Disciplinary Law for lawyers from the University of Amsterdam.

Robert’s daily practice

‘As an attorney, I am committed to helping independent professionals who are dealing with a complaint or claim that may result in disciplinary proceedings and/or a professional liability claim. First of all, I investigate the lawfulness and reasonableness of the complaint or claim. This is important, because in practice, two-thirds of all disciplinary claims are eventually proved to be unfounded. Naturally, I consult with my client to determine a suitable strategy. Wherever possible, I aim for a case to be resolved by mutual agreement, sometimes succeeding in convincing the opposing party of the untenability of their claim based on arguments, and sometimes by reaching a settlement. As far as I am concerned, going to the disciplinary court is a last resort, but I will not hesitate to take that step if it proves necessary.’

Stay up to date

The latest developments

Corporate Law

Governance in healthcare (III): the supervisory board

10 March 2025

Governance involves organizing an institution in such a way that the quality of management and oversight is ensured. In recent years, this has become an increasingly important topic in the healthcare sector. The underlying idea is that good governance will enhance the quality of care. There are several key points to consider in the healthcare sector, which will be addressed in the blog series on governance in healthcare. This blog discusses the supervisory board.

Read more

Corporate Law

Governance in healthcare (II): The Healthcare Governance Code

20 February 2025

Governance involves organizing an entity in such a way that the quality of management and its supervision is ensured. In recent years, this has become an increasingly important topic in the healthcare sector. The idea is that good governance will improve the quality of care. There are several points of attention for the healthcare sector to consider, which will be discussed in the blog series on Governance in Healthcare. This blog will discuss the Healthcare Governance Code.

Read more

Corporate Law

A deal is a deal: Good Leaver receives only the nominal value for their skhares

13 February 2025

Many shareholders' agreements include provisions for the event that a shareholder leaves. It is usually agreed that this shareholder is obliged to transfer their shares to the other shareholders or the company. The price that a shareholder receives from the other shareholders or the company often depends on the reason for their departure. A shareholder who has proven their value to the company and has adhered to the agreements ('good leaver') usually receives a higher price than someone who leaves due to, for example, fraud, theft, dismissal as a director or employee, or failure to comply with the agreements ('bad leaver'). A recent ruling by the Amsterdam District Court confirms the importance of properly documenting such agreements in the shareholders' agreement.

Read more