Robert Sanders

Robert Sanders

Senior Associate | Attorney at law

Robert Sanders is a disciplinary law expert in De Clercq’s corporate law practice. He specialises in assisting independent professionals who are subject to disciplinary regulations within their field, such as lawyers, notaries, accountants and medical practitioners.

Disciplinary Law

Robert Sanders is a disciplinary law expert in De Clercq’s corporate law practice. He specialises in assisting independent professionals who are subject to disciplinary regulations within their field, such as lawyers, notaries, accountants and medical practitioners. He enjoys analysing content in detail, using the knowledge and insights he has acquired to help his clients.

Education and career

Following his law studies at Leiden University and after completing his military service as a reserve officer in the Royal Air Force, Robert embarked upon his civilian career in 1995 as an editor and publisher. He worked at three leading publishing houses over the course of 14 years, focusing on publishing medical, tax, financial and legal journals, among other things. In the meantime, he also completed his Bachelor’s degree in History (cum laude) at Utrecht University. In 2009, Robert switched to the Dutch Bar Association, where he mainly worked on disciplinary cases for more than six years, initially as a senior policy advisor and subsequently as an attorney. In 2017, Robert received his doctorate in Disciplinary Law for lawyers from the University of Amsterdam.

Robert’s daily practice

‘As an attorney, I am committed to helping independent professionals who are dealing with a complaint or claim that may result in disciplinary proceedings and/or a professional liability claim. First of all, I investigate the lawfulness and reasonableness of the complaint or claim. This is important, because in practice, two-thirds of all disciplinary claims are eventually proved to be unfounded. Naturally, I consult with my client to determine a suitable strategy. Wherever possible, I aim for a case to be resolved by mutual agreement, sometimes succeeding in convincing the opposing party of the untenability of their claim based on arguments, and sometimes by reaching a settlement. As far as I am concerned, going to the disciplinary court is a last resort, but I will not hesitate to take that step if it proves necessary.’

Stay up to date

The latest developments

Corporate Law

Bankruptcy After Turboliquidation

21 August 2025

Turboliquidation is popular among entrepreneurs seeking to terminate their company quickly and cost-effectively.
With a single resolution by the shareholder(s) and registration with the Chamber of Commerce, the legal entity can cease to exist—provided that no assets remain. However, this does not automatically eliminate outstanding debts. Creditors may still petition the court to declare the company bankrupt. Below, you’ll find what is required for such a bankruptcy declaration and why careful application of turboliquidation is essential.

Read more

Corporate Law

Did the evaluation committee act within its mandate?

25 July 2025

A bidder accuses an evaluation committee of having acted outside the pre-established evaluation framework by failing to recognize the “added value” of his proposal. An interesting detail: this concerned a contract not subject to public procurement obligations. As a result, Part 2 of the Public Procurement Act does not apply. What does apply instead?

Read more

Corporate Law

Outcome of the consultation on the revision of the procurement directives

27 June 2025

The European Commission has published a summary of the initial findings from the consultation on the European procurement directives. The consultation yielded a total of 733 responses. What do these responses reveal about the functioning of the current directives?

Read more